翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Wienerwaldsee ・ Wiener–Araya graph ・ Wiener–Hopf method ・ Wiener–Ikehara theorem ・ Wiener–Khinchin theorem ・ Wiener–Lévy theorem ・ Wiener–Wintner theorem ・ Wienhausen ・ Wienhausen Abbey ・ Wieniawa ・ Wieniawa coat of arms ・ Wieniawa, Masovian Voivodeship ・ Wieniawski ・ Wielęcin ・ WIEM Encyklopedia ・ Wieman v. Updegraff ・ Wiembach ・ Wiembecke ・ Wiemersdorf ・ Wiemerstedt ・ Wien (community), Wisconsin ・ Wien (disambiguation) ・ Wien (river) ・ Wien Air Alaska ・ Wien Air Alaska Flight 99 ・ Wien approximation ・ Wien bridge ・ Wien bridge oscillator ・ Wien Consolidated Airlines Flight 55 ・ Wien effect Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Wieman v. Updegraff ： ウィキペディア英語版 Wieman v. Updegraff ''Wieman v. Updegraff'', 344 U.S. 183 (1952), is a unanimous ruling by the United States Supreme Court which held that Oklahoma loyalty oath legislation violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it did not give individuals the opportunity to abjure membership in subversive organizations. Due process requires that individuals have ''scienter'' (knowledge that their membership or support violates the loyalty oath), and the Oklahoma statute did not accommodate this requirement. ==Background== In 1950, the state of Oklahoma enacted legislation requiring all state officers and employees to take an oath pledging loyalty to the United States of America, affirming that they did not advocate the violent overthrow of the U.S. government, and denying direct or indirect involvement with or support of any "agency, party, organization, association, or group whatever which has been officially determined by the United States Attorney General or other authorized agency of the United States to be a communist front or subversive organization".〔''Weiman v. Updegraff'', 344 U.S. 183, 187.〕 Several faculty and staff at Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College refused to take the oath within the required 30 days after employment. Paul W. Updegraff, an Oklahoma citizen, sued in the District Court of Oklahoma County to prevent the state from paying these individuals their salaries. The faculty and staff members asked to intervene in the suit, and were permitted to do so. They argued that the Act was a bill of attainder; an ex post facto law; made it impossible for them to fulfill their contracts with the state; and violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The district court upheld the Act. The faculty and staff appealed to the Oklahoma Supreme Court. The Oklahoma Supreme Court upheld the Act.〔''Board of Regents v. Updegraff'', 205 Okla. 301, 237 P. 2d 131 (1951).〕 The faculty and staff appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which granted certiorari. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Wieman v. Updegraff」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.